Yes, nothing would surprise me at this point.
Almost every news type broadcast, even religious ones are done with at least two people and preferably ones of opposite sex.
This is how 700 Club does it. The only shows where it is just one person talking to the audience are shows where the anchor has a personality that can hold the audience i.e. John Oliver, Bill O'Reilly, Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart.
there's an interest point raised by stephen letts at around the 7 minute mark of the intro video;.
much of the equipment used to build the studio was made available by donation.
he twice mentions (once at the start of the video) the need for "support", which we can assume means donations.
Theres a lot more to it than that, pixel. Visit one of the other threads regarding equipment lists and implementation.
But yeah, I think a 1.5 years is a huge stretch. Twit did a whole house in 7 months complete with offices, multiple sets, public reception/lobby with 1.2 million.
there's no doubt that the wtbts isn't sparing the hard-earned donations from the r&f on its latest trial of jw broadcasting.. this screenshot i took from the "behind-the-scenes" is just one of many examples of top-end tech gear being used in this endeavour.. .
why does this guy need harmankardon speakers when he's using cad software...and note the iphone.
this guy's a bethelite?.
and bandwidth. Anyone know who they are getting bandwidth through?
there's an interest point raised by stephen letts at around the 7 minute mark of the intro video;.
much of the equipment used to build the studio was made available by donation.
he twice mentions (once at the start of the video) the need for "support", which we can assume means donations.
Yes, I'd really like to hear from somebody in the industry how long it would take to set up a TV news studio from scratch with unlimited free labor around the clock.
http://tv.jw.org/ is up and running.. see bro lett stumble his way through the introduction.
he really does have a good face for radio.. http://tv.jw.org/#video/vodmonthlyprogramming/pub-jwb_e_201410_1_video.
nice sweaty top lip at 15 mins onwards - the pressure is showing!!.
We found a spot in one of our buildings for the studio!
We ordered TV equipment! And it showed up!
We copied the set design of the 700 Club!
We give you an anonymous quote from an unnamed 'industry professional' to say it takes a year and a half to do this! Using hundreds of unpaid workers around the clock, we did it in two months!
Truly this has been blessed by Jehovah.
anybody going or who can give us the noolite hot from the gb a$$?.
.
.
just to to http://tv.jw.org/
shows they do not understand the definition of the word 'broadcasting.' this is narrowcasting.
Do not underestimate the stupidity of people.
A huge percentage of people never look into/research *anything* they are told by an authority figure, or what they get in viral emails/facebook posts.
Look at what is popular on TV. Look at the insipid phone games people spend money on. Look at the most popular people on YouTube and Vine.
The next generation will be even worse.
seriously, i watched it on cnn last night.
it sounded like a wind up first of all.. .
.
so many questions...link? "going to be allowed.." was it not before? allowed by whom? "sounded like a wind up first of all?"
I don't know what to make at all of that last sentence.
Are you referring to the three week old story regarding the Satanic Temple making plans to hand out literature in Orange County Public Schools as a form of protest to other religious groups allowed to hand out bibles, etc?
i came across this video ... and watched it ... why?
i don't know really, but i found it intersting.. especially interesting was how these men used the bible, they knew their message, they used an actual hard copy bible that has obviously been studied, and the older jw man, well, he was using a tablet.
it seemed cumbersome compared to using the actual bible.
Backup as in the thing dies/wont turn on/wont connect etc etc etc.
'my tablet died. oh well, lets get donuts'
i came across this video ... and watched it ... why?
i don't know really, but i found it intersting.. especially interesting was how these men used the bible, they knew their message, they used an actual hard copy bible that has obviously been studied, and the older jw man, well, he was using a tablet.
it seemed cumbersome compared to using the actual bible.
Witnessing without an actual bible to backup the tablet?
and with a bluetooth earpiece in while trying to talk?
LAAAAAAAMMMMMEEEEEE
